On the opposite side of the coin, what's the deal with chicken nuggets? First it was McDonalds, and now it seems everyone is jumping on the 'that's-not-shaped-like-food' bandwagon. I don't eat McNuggets, but on occasion, nuggets from other fast food icons make a quick and tidy snack when I'm on the run, and they're all shaped the same. Some of them look like Minnesota. Some of them are shaped like animators used to draw pork chops back in the 1940's. Some of them are shaped like paramecia. Some of them have no rhyme or reason whatsoever, and they're only benefit is the ability to fit neatly into a vat of barbecue or sweet-and-sour.
I get the dinosaurs, the stars and the other amusing kid-friendly shapes, because we want our kids to eat something besides paste and scabs. But unless you come out with the full fifty state nugget pack to teach them geography, it seems wrong to pick on one or two. And 50 nuggets would just add to the growing childhood obesity issues in this country, especially dipped in honey mustard.
Round is good. Shape them like drumsticks, I'll be happy. It's an extrusion, you can't tell me these are the only shapes we can come up with.
|Does that look like a McNugget/New Hampshire to you?|
This makes perfect sense to me, that half of the meat we consume is already ground, so why not remove the animal cruelty from the picture? I love the American farm and the American farmer, but I've read much on the environmental impact a single cow can have on global warming, and how each cow produces 1/16th the meat-to-pollution ratio of smaller animals like chickens. And now, everyone could grow their own meat. I'm on board.
The only tragedy here? Every day I don't finish my old novel is a day that my imaginary happenings become closer to truth.
Damn. I wish I had some of those cheesy peanut butter crackers.